Client Results · 2026

What Month One Actually Looks Like

Two companies started U.S. market entry with us this year. Below are their real first-month numbers — client names withheld at their request, figures unedited, including the metric we're still fixing. If you're deciding whether this works, the honest version is more useful than a testimonial.

Why the first month looks unimpressive on paper

Month one is the most lopsided month of any engagement: most of the work becomes infrastructure you can't see — the English site, the search and AI-search optimisation, the target-company database, the content library, the sending domain and its warm-up. None of that produces an order in week two. Every touch afterwards depends on it. So read the numbers below as a starting baseline, not a harvest.

Case A · Precision electronics manufacturer (East China)

Situation: strong manufacturing capability, an outdated English website, no U.S. buyer pipeline. Actual outreach window: 12 days.

The number that mattered: of the 283 purchasing decision-makers who opened, 169 clicked through to the product content — nearly six in ten. That ratio says the targeting and the positioning were right. Those 169 warm contacts became month two's entire follow-up programme.

Case B · Health & wellness brand

Situation: a regulated consumer product entering the U.S. through clinics, specialty retail and distributors. Actual outreach window: about three weeks.

What we got wrong — both times

Bounce rate. Case A came in at 7.3% and Case B at 4.2%, against a healthy line of under 2%. The cause is ordinary: first-pass company data always contains dead and mistyped addresses. It is also entirely fixable — third-party verification of the full database before the next send, which we scheduled for month two in both accounts. We publish this because a first month with no flaws usually means someone edited the report.

Zero complaints is the quiet win. Thousands of cold emails with not a single spam report means the targeting and the copy were legitimate, and the sending domain's reputation stayed clean. Plenty of campaigns burn their domain in week one and lose the channel permanently. A clean sender is an asset you can scale against; a burnt one can't be bought back.

The pattern under both cases

Same sequence, different industries: build the foundation, then open the channels, then compound. Website and search structure first, because every email click and social visit lands there. Then the target database, because outreach without a list is noise. Then content, then sending — and only then do the numbers start to mean anything. Both clients hit month two with a warm-contact pool and a sender reputation intact, which is exactly what month one is supposed to buy.

What we'd tell you before you start

Want to see what month one would look like for you?

Book a free call — we'll map your target buyers, your channels and a realistic first-90-days plan before you commit to anything.

Book a Free Call →